HG vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HG or ^GSPC.
Correlation
The correlation between HG and ^GSPC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HG vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HG:
0.99
^GSPC:
0.24
HG:
1.62
^GSPC:
0.47
HG:
1.19
^GSPC:
1.07
HG:
1.83
^GSPC:
0.24
HG:
4.65
^GSPC:
1.08
HG:
7.53%
^GSPC:
4.25%
HG:
35.26%
^GSPC:
19.00%
HG:
-21.07%
^GSPC:
-56.78%
HG:
-13.99%
^GSPC:
-14.02%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HG achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -10.18% return.
HG
-2.47%
-11.75%
-0.75%
33.33%
N/A
N/A
^GSPC
-10.18%
-6.92%
-9.92%
5.42%
12.98%
9.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HG vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HG
^GSPC
HG vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
HG vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HG drawdown since its inception was -21.07%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HG vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 13.86% and 13.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.